Mark charging for truth
What is it with the name Mark(us) and charging for truth? I still think the donation method is a better model.
Updates from June, 2016 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts
-
Fakeologist
-
Fakeologist
Cough cough
The Dangers of Smoking Are Purposely Overblown – Dangers of Electronic Cigarettes Are Hidden
-
Fakeologist
Brexit to Brstay?
Xile? Tom?
Did a madman just doom Brexit and save Europe? Analysis
Was he political? Was he an enraged nationalist? Did he dwell on the fringes of the racist right? Was he consumed with blind Trumpian anger or simply out of his mind? Was he all, or perhaps even none, of the above?
Source: Did a madman just doom Brexit and save Europe? Analysis | Toronto Star
-
Tom-Dalpra
Oh , total psyOp. The Jo Cox murder.
Multi-faceted, as are all these Ops, one purpose certainly seems to be to manage voting behaviour and ensure the UK remains in the EU.
It seems a fairly simple mechanism. The guy who killed her was said to be a right wing fanatic – the Brexit campaign is seen as the cause of the ‘right wingers’. The British National Party’s Nick Griffin, Nigel Farage and Donald Trump all showing support. Go figure.This battle will now have been fought and won with blood shed. A memorable victory going forward.
Forum thread here ( Ab, CAN YOU POSSIBLY EDIT THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD ? I mistakenly dated it 6th not 16th. Not the end of the world, just thought I’d ask ).
http://fakeologist.com/forums/topic/the-joe-cox-murder-birstall-uk-6th-june-2016/#post-713885 -
Vespadouglas
This is not the reason that brexit will be thwarted . This is , however , the justification and reasoning for brexit to be thwarted . The word on the street is undoubtedly for “leave” but we will be told on 24/june the 10% undecided jumped onto stay ( prompted by events) at the 11th hour , to save the day.
-
-
Fakeologist
Monsters, Inc., September 11 (Orlando, FL) & undoing the mainstream media’s “Culture of Fear” – Zach
-
Fakeologist
-
Fakeologist
Charlie Sheen, Whoopi Goldberg to star in 9/11 elevator drama
Yuck. It never ends, does it?
Charlie Sheen and Whoopi Goldberg have teamed up for a new 9/11 terror attack drama.
Source: Charlie Sheen, Whoopi Goldberg to star in 9/11 elevator drama
-
Vespadouglas
The story you are about to see is based on actual events
-
fakeologist
Actual #HRDPAR
-
Vespadouglas
The story you are about to see is based on the imagination of screenwriters , commissioned by the US intelligence services .
-
Vespadouglas
Some of these “full time” researchers could apply for a job in the cinema . The successful candidates could work that message into the screening and be dutifully sacked . Winwin
-
-
-
-
-
Tom Dalpra
Peekay appears to be a bit part actor and maybe sometime, game show contestant. Proof of nothing, it does make me wonder ”Is he playing a part now ?”
Is this a young Peter ?
Peekay ‘clears up’ the issue here. I have to say I think it’s quite possible that he’s being straight about his acting and I don’t see that it necessarily means that he’s some kind of agent. I’ve always found his analysis amusing and unlike Jungle Surfer and Russianvids I can’t say I’ve noticed any glaring disinformation from him.
His delivery style does make me wonder though. His broad, blunt approach assures a marginal audience.
-
xileffilex
Apart from his obstinate and suspicious blindness towards the central role of the Epsteins [whose coterie of influential friends includes John Kerry] in the Boston hoax, what else do we have?
-
Tom-Dalpra
i dunno if you saw my edit above xilef.
I’d add that he’s hosted David Weiss and Russianvids in his chats. Groups of busy, popular, ‘alternative internet youtubers’…makes me wonder…
-
xileffilex
I was watching two long videos about Boston, with David Weiss and Dave McGowan [who really doesn’t look terribly well] Here’s the latter, from which you can find the other
They’ve both really done their homework on this event but they only call out the pathetic actors who were brought into this hoax, not the establishment organisers. Easy targets? We all have different takes on events – whom can we trust? -
Vespadouglas
PK RV and JS worry me due to the lack of depth in most of their videos . They always seem to be the first to pop up after every psyop but a lot of the stuff they push is designed to leave the curious scratching their heads . Orange shoes , red t shirts , gematria , dgb bs , etc.
Its a turn off for many “lurkers” I think .When someone (not quite so quickly) uses the same footage and it is analised properly people will say ” oh ive already seen that footage . Its a little bit too conspiracy theorist for me .”
“orange shoes , orange shoes !”
No peekay.
The fact that they are walking the wrong way to “safety” is the story.
Not the orange fucking shoes or the “masonic poses”Any friend of david vice is suspect . (as are many of his double bluff foes also)
-
Tom-Dalpra
Mmm, yeh. They’re all flippin dodgy aren’t they haha.
xilef asks ”who can we trust?’
ermm…eachother? haha I trust you anyway Felix.
-
willard
Good catch, Tom. Frankly I do not see how PK and the others can keep up the volume of vids that they do.
I will say this though. I sent an email to Chris Kendal at Hoax Busters Call that I could get not through, despite trying both of his emails, I then tried posting the same message on his blog and I was unsuccessful. John Adams over there said he could not post material either. The material was getting blocked.
http://hoaxbusterscall.blogspot.com/2016/06/orlando-green-screen.html#disqus_thread
The next day Russianvids posted this video which had the same info presented in the same format in the email I sent Chris, although I did not include information about the people on the roof. It set off my spider sense. Sort of creepy but I could see how he may have say the same thing I did.
I did notice that Russianvids slightly changed his position on Alex Jones/ Bill Hicks based on information posted here.
Makes a body wonder.
@Vespadouglas, I agree with you about the depth and the type of analysis. They do that comes across as superficial and will turn people off to more in depth analysis later.
-
-
Tom-Dalpra
A little more on Peekay and something I found an intriguing bit of pantomime.
Clearly there’s some history with Peekay and Jeff C – why would they bother ? –
In this video from three months ago, Jeff C claims to expose Peekay as cheating by showing he’s used sped- up footage of the original space walk to support his case.On that specific point he appears to have a case. Certainly the footage Peekay uses seems sped up.
Now, of course we know the footage is dodgy at whatever speed and it looks to me as if Peekay makes a couple of fair points.So is this sped-up footage possibly a deliberately attached strawman ? There to discredit anything else he says ? And give Jeff – they really have proper space missions ) the chance to look ‘good’ ( I should have used quotes before when saying that, it doesn’t make him look good in my eyes ) in ‘ exposing’ him?
In the comments to the video this one drew my eye.
”Adalardo – Peekay22 is Australian Actor Peter Kusznir who was well known for making conspiracy theorists look insane by threatening Airline Pilots during his Chemtrails act. He’s a failed actor who was planted into the truther movement to make us look insane. Great video! ”
Now this Adalardo can’t be too ”on-it” if he’s a Jeff C fan, but did Kusznir really have some kind of ‘well known’ chemtrail period where he ‘threatened pilots’ ?
I didn’t know about that if he did…On that sped-up youtube footage, there may be a simple explanation that I haven’t heard. I’d be quite interested to hear what Peekay has said about it,.
-
-
-
-
-
Fakeologist
-
Fakeologist
FEAR training everywhere
@Hoaxolizer: Scottish schools evacuated for second time in a week after hoax bomb threats #Ayr… http://hoax.trendolizer.com/2016/05/scottish-schools-evacuated-for-second-time-in-a-week-after-hoax-bomb-threats.html http://twitter.com/Hoaxolizer/status/736201158604292096/photo/1
Shared via TweetCaster -
Willard
“There is some art you do not have to sign.” -Psy-Ops
Quoted in Kingdom of Fear by Hunter S. Thompson
(2003) Simon and Schuster p. 212
Reply