The (F)interesting rise and fall of a blood-analysis technology
The story in short is:
- A silicon valley start-up promises a technology that is able to do all (240) blood tests with one drop of blood
*The promises go wrong – maybe also because they failed to get a license to roll out in Afghanistan
*A enterprise’s biochemist “commits suicide” in 2013 when he “realized” the fraudulent software/machine (could not find him but deserves the quotes, i think…)
*The initiators are sued, have to pay a little reparations – 9 billions get lost in thin air
The interesting point for me was that this story is being analyzed as a conspiracy although it is actually standard procedere in the business world. The discussion is an exercise for deceptive language and perverted facts.
https://www.wnycstudios.org/story/rise-and-fall-elizabeth-holmes/
[…] savechat.fakeologist.com… Saved Threaded Fakeologist Chat The (F)interesting rise and fall of a blood-analysis technology The story in short is: A silicon valley start-up promises a technology that is able to do all (240) blood tests with one drop of blood *The promises go wrong – maybe also because they failed … […]
This “Theranos” story is quite interesting as Elizabeth Holmes made her breakthrough very quickly as she managed to raise 6 billion dollars for her health venture as a 20 year old Stanford University drop out.
–
An interesting detail is that Holmes seems to mimick Steve Jobs, another Palo Alto business wonder and university drop-out with her black turtle neck sweaters.
–
The question of EGI was raised by Ab in the FAK 203 podcast, and from Holmes biography, it is very clear she originates from Elite parents*. By analysing her apparence, she does have many male typical features including a big head, slanted forehead, significant brow-structure and a solid male chin.
–
Although i agree we should be suspect of both Elizabeth Holmes role in the larger medical scam, it is difficult to make a definate conclusion on her inclusion or not in Elite Gender Inversion. She does make a good candidate and would consitute a well disguised EGI enitity if we were able to be sure of her EGI case as we now must expect as the Elite are all the more carefull and skilled in their management of EGI. Suspect for sure, but also ambivalent.
–
Not surprisingly, the “Zal rule” will soon come into play for this case as Holmes will be portrayed by Jennifer Lawrence (very likely EGI) in the movie Bad Blood based on homonymous book (2018) by John Carreyrou.
—
*Holmes’ father is Christian Rasmus Holmes IV worked in government agencies such as USAID, and her mother is Congressional committee staffer Noel Anne Daoust (wikipedia)
–
Not sure why the image joined in my post above do not show – it is viewable here
Thanks, UNreal for the reaction and the further information. Meanwhile i searched for the etymology of the word “Theranos” and – as my first instinct was – it is a constructed word that does not exist, an artificial creation that sounds very greek or maybe also latin, but is in fact nothing of both. The closest associations i have for the word Theranos would be that it is a creation out of ether (ancient greek for air) and Uranos (lat. Uranus) (ancient greek for sky). Quite clever, most of the products of the pharma industry have such names that do not mean anything exept that they sound greek or latin.
If the Elite merely play with words,the might use etymology as they see fit as both Latin and other ‘ancient’ versions of languages and word-roots from the past probably never existed.
–
As Holmes seems to be the main character in a soap-opera that was meant to fail – and her product pure fantasy most probably – maybe the hidden meaning in the company name “Theranos” is more of a joke as it is a phony operation.
–
By bringing up “Uranus” it is reminiscent of “Theranos” and maybe they are phonetically even closer than the spelling. It seems to me Uranus is joke name of a non-existing gaz giant: ‘Your Anus’ (Uranus). Likewise, ‘Their Anus’ (Theranos) seems like a joke incorporated in the Holmes deception by its scriptwriters.
–
Phonetic anagrams and literal musing seems to often drive many false storylines as they by themselves are meaningless and when you have an inside joke for the members of such operations to refer to – you suddenly have meaning out of thin air..
—
That is an interesting angle, UNreal, with the associations about the “Ur – anus”. But i would be cautious to declare all ancient languages as frauds. I have not so much insight into latin, but i have quite a good basis in ancient greek. Of course the timelines are constructed – based on hypotheses and the aims of the powerholders of each period. The texts themselves are evidence though that such languages existed and the volume and diversity as well as the interrelations among the various linguistic patterns allow well founded conclusions about the existence of multiple “older varieties” of greek dialects.
What i meant to say is that ancient languages have been altered to fit the current matrix. As an example, as ancient Egypt did not exist as is portrayed as the Pyramids and other artefacts are quite recent*, a whole alphabet, language and history was invented. This situation does not mean that Egypt wasn’t inhabited in ancient times – i think it was. And the people who lived there surely spoke and wrote a language. But as the records are altered, i think the language and etymology as well has been changed.
–
Regarding Greece, i’m not very well informed but i’m afraid the historical glory possibly is much more invented than real, as the architecture like Parthenon clearly is more recent than contended (the architecture of Rome likewise with The Colisseum being a very problemtaic building even technically as to how the public was seated and accessed the tribunes etc).
–
When it comes to “ancient texts” i remain skeptical any of the writing that predates the french revolution are trustworthy. Not that nothing happened before the modern era, but everything we are told is clearly altered to fit the current narrative. An exemple could be older texts that existed before 1789 that were redacted as they were preserved – possibly changed according to the historical timeline established by Scaliger and christian scolars (invention of the “dark ages” etc)
–
Regarding the critical analyses of history and historical texts, i find Christopher Pfister’s manifesto a good reference for how we might want to analyse past events and documents. The 33 Dead Sea scrolls of the beebell (bible) found in 11 caves are a good exemple how the Elite need to falsify age of documents that in fact were written or re-written in modern times (16-1700s).
–
A new manifesto to revise prevailing history and chronology
https://www.dillum.ch/html/manifesto_historical_criticism_ch.pfister_2016.htm
—
*A Pyramid the Army did
http://allunreal.com/2017/11/pyramid-army-did
Aposteriority is not an invention of the modern era for sure but while pyramids and parthenons can be built later and dated earlier, nobody, never and under no real or imaginary circumstances can create thousands of texts in multiple dialects. It would be equal to the aim of the digital technologies to create an artificial brain… Human language is a collevtive, living entity and not an artifice – although the “elites” always aimed at destroying language by ruling over its use or illegalize its living form. Texts are dead language, yes, but they are materialized speech, human imagination and experience. The interpretation e.g. of the Odysee can change and did so many times but they still are material evidence of the existence of collectives that lived in that languages in one or the other way.
As of the “ancient greek glory”, it was invented by the german foundational era of the late 18th and the 19th century as opposed to the french and british empire ambitions in the eastern mediterranean region which led to the constitution of the “new greek state” under four powers (the russian included) to which his “pre-history” was given by the less bad emperors, lol.
I do hear your point about the existence of too many texts which is a very interesting debate. I do not personally consider there to be too many texts written despite the fact there are huge amounts of books in existence just as there are now incredible numbers of videos on the internet.
–
In fact nearly every book we have today are just centuries old – not older*. Paper is very limited in lifespan and our belief that there are lots of books that factually are 1000 year old or older is not true. Very old books were written recently as well – but the originals might be old of course. In a nutshell – we have indeed produced all the books that exist in the past hundreds of years factually, so the question therefore would be if there were original texts or not.
–
So – were there original texts (or not) before our updated versions of these pretended old and certified texts ?
–
I would say “not” in the case of the Bible. So if even the Bible is a modern invention – what about the other universally accepted old books ? I do not have the answer, but i do think it is very possible to create old reference books just like the Bible attests to.
–
We might have to factor in how written materials were the main propaganda tool for much longer than we in our modern epoch have had photography, moving images, films and TV. Just by looking at the amount of films and filmscripts alone would make us realise how intense the propaganda is pushed today, and also remind us this was equally the case back when only written materials were used to brainwash us all (after the Elite learnt us to read of course – “in our own interest”,,,).
–
*the exception is that books are found or kept in their original state, and we have to be suspect of how these really old paper books have survived and are rediscovered in modern times – often by in a pot or other hidden primitive storage method..