Hellbent on Hicks
I don’t deny the teeth (which I find good evidence). As much as I want to believe that Hicks and Jones are the same person, there’s something off that I can’t quite figure out. It doesn’t even really matter to me if one could prove that they’re the same person. This seems to be a distraction more than anything, to keep us off focussing on Alex Jones’ real purpose: to discredit anyone looking into truth.
The raspy voice would be very hard to keep up hour after hour – unless he had some disruptive surgery.
Yes, Hicks/Jones in retrospect seems a gimme. And I agree, it is more important to focus on Jones’ disinformation role than the trickery behind identity switching and lifetime acting. We found many, many more – Joplin/Amy Goodman, Hendrix/Cornel West, Fuller/Bill O’Reilly, DeWilde/Thom Hartmann, Pam Courson/Baba Wawa … and it seemed like a game. And, of course, few believed us … people of average curiosity are far more likely too see what they are told they see by authority figures than to question that authority with far-out findings like ours.
So what, we had to wonder, should be our goal? There is going to be no “awakening” – I have never bought in to that missionary notion. The power we are up against is deeply entrenched and in control of everything. What is the point?
And the answer is that this is a fucked up planet, for sure, but that people are good, so we have to just enjoy the search for truth for its own value. It has to satisfy on its own, because if it does not, it yields nothing but frustration.
And I am OK with that.
JONES IS HICKS IS DISINFORMATION
( GET OVER IT )
I’ll describe my experience with the Hicks is Jones idea. It might help someone who finds themselves here.
When the idea was first put to me I thought it was worth looking at. With what I’ve come to learn, anything is possible.
Having spent many hours listening and watching both these characters I felt i had a fairly good sense of both of them and though it seemed a fairly ‘ out there’ claim, if Hicks was Jones, then I certainly wanted to know about it.
It didn’t take long for the idea to seem very unlikely.
Hicks was quite a tall man. Jones is more squat and smaller in stature.
This, I’d say, is impossible if they’re supposed to be the same person.
The Jones character is simply too small in stature.
When I pointed out this verifiable fact ( there’s abundant evidence to pretty much confirm the alleged heights and builds of the two individuals) someone suggested that Hicks probably ‘always wore heals ‘.
This, I would suggest, is a very weak argument and someone is going to have to bring me some real evidence before I change my opinion that Jones is obviously NOT Hicks.
With this taken, it’s easy then for me to see that Russianvids can’t be trusted.
What kind of real researcher would persist with that outlandish and quite easily provably wrong,idea?
An agent of disinformation, of course.
With this ‘Jones is Hicks’ nonsense attached to his ‘research ‘ Russianvids is invalidating much of whatever else he’s saying to many, whilst sending his believers off to go and help make conspiracy theorists look stupid by continuing to plant this turd.
So, one more time again. Disregarding the fact that Hicks was funny and Jones isn’t, Bill Hicks was simply a man of bigger stature than Alex Jones and in view of that, calling them the same person seems ridiculous.
.