Updates from June, 2016 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • fakeologist

    Fakeologist 10:08 pm on June 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

    Fatal house explosion rocks Mississauga | Toronto Star 

    Update 7/1/16 what are the cops hiding?

    https://youtu.be/0dhsA-NKXrE
    https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/06/29/peel-cop-confronts-photographer-in-aftermath-of-mississauga-explosion.html

    Update2

    Chemtrailers and aluminum foil covered windows, along with being an convicted murderer and end of worlder. A true Alex Jones special.

    One of Nadler’s relatives, who didn’t want to be identified out of fear for their safety, said Peel police phoned the family Thursday to say they had found a body at the site of the explosion.

    The person said Nadler, who is estranged from his relatives, believed planes emit poison gas as jet streams and that the world would end in the year 2000.

    https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/06/30/special-peel-police-team-searching-for-evidence-of-foul-play-in-mississauga-house-explosion.html
    —
    I always find these house explosions curious – rarely do we get information on cause after the fact, even years later. I’m not saying this is fake – but curious about the cause.

    One nearby resident described Tuesday’s explosion in Mississauga as looking like a “war zone.” Peel police confirmed one person has been pronounced dead, and nine had minor injuries. They are also going door-to-door looking for more patients.

    Source: Fatal house explosion rocks Mississauga | Toronto Star

    Jungle Surfer makes a video but it doesn’t add much https://youtu.be/WcBNvWibhkU

     
  • fakeologist

    Fakeologist 1:09 pm on June 28, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

    Amanda Todd’s suspected cyberbully can be extradited: Dutch court 

    Extradite a sim over a sim’s suicide.  The swindle is global in scope.

    An Amsterdam court has approved the extradition of a Dutch man suspected him of a string of crimes against British Columbia teenager Amanda Todd, who took her own life after being bullied online.

    http://www.torontosun.com/2016/06/28/amanda-todds-suspected-cyberbully-can-be-extradited-dutch-court

     
    • fakeologist

      Fakeologist 11:18 am on June 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

      Documents Reveal Hillary’s Luxurious Demands For Speech | The Daily Caller 

      Who says the US doesn’t have a royalty?

      Release by a ‘hacker’, ie the intelligence agencies who love to create divisions.

      Democratic National Committee documents leaked by a hacker Tuesday reveal that Hillary Clinton’s requirements to give a speech included a private flight and a luxurious presidential hotel suite.

      http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/22/leaked-documents-reveal-hillarys-luxurious-demands-for-private-speech/

       
      • fakeologist

        Fakeologist 6:44 am on June 27, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

        Crash Trash reporting 

        Update:now there are 11…a story just to change the count to a magical number??? Hoax code update?

        Police confirm there were 11 vehicles involved in the crash, not 12 as they had initially reported.

        https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/06/27/family-of-3-confirmed-dead-among-4-victims-in-highway-400-accident.html

        In your face eh.

        —-

        News reporting is the only thing unrecognizable from reality. I have no idea if this crash really happened – since we don’t have verifiable info – but this did occur very near to a Ministry of Transportation yard where it could have easily been staged.

        A beginning of summer staged crash to dramatize the harsh reality of poor driving during the congested period and to have a full EMT drill are distinct possibilities here.Ontario Provincial Police have confirmed four people, including one child, were killed in a fiery, multi-vehicle crash Friday night on Highway 400 in north Toronto when a car drove into the back of a transport truck.Paramedics had pronounced three adults and one child dead at the scene. Two people were taken to hospital with non-life-threatening injuries, while several others sustained minor injuries.Paramedics initially reported five deaths, but police confirmed later four people were killed in the crash.

        Source: Fiery crash on Hwy 400 leaves 4 dead, including child, vehicles ‘completely unrecognizable’ – Toronto – CBC News

         
        • fakeologist

          Fakeologist 9:58 pm on June 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

          Suspicious Olympic bike crash 

          Never heard of the guy, but this story smells – right in my backyard.

          Steve Hancock, an avid cyclist and former Olympian who was struck by a car while riding his bike in Mississauga, has died in hospital from his injuries.Karen Simpson, Hancock’s wife, confirmed in an email her husband died at 6:30 a.m. Friday. Lina McPhee, a close friend of the Hancock family, described the couple as “her best friends.”

          Source: Former British Olympian dies in hospital after Mississauga cycling crash | Toronto Star

           
        • fakeologist

          Fakeologist 4:44 am on June 26, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

          Super programming 

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bJByODqpZg

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bJByODqpZg&feature=em-uploademail

           
          • fakeologist

            Fakeologist 11:11 am on June 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

            She’s the bees knees 

            I came for the warm shoulder.

            https://youtu.be/j-4YWfEKA0o

             
            • fakeologist

              Fakeologist 3:55 pm on June 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

              Perfect for psyOps 

              Secrecy over victims of police shootings to be reviewed The possibility of a nameless, faceless civilian victim of a police shooting in Ontario is due to a controversial SIU policy change in 2012 that states the victims of police-involved fatalities are not identified unless next-of-kin gives permission.

              Source: Secrecy over victims of police shootings to be reviewed | Toronto Star

               
              • Vespadouglas

                Vespadouglas 5:59 am on June 21, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

                Spy coming in from the cold ? 

                From David Weiss and the other hot potato dudes through to Russianvids and Peekay and now facillitating a link between one of fakeologists’ honest few (rollo) and one of these “high output” characters –  who up until now have never shown any interest or given any recognition to fakeologist.com or cluesforum.info – we have the man of the moment , JLB.

                A very clever man indeed , but is it possible he is simply playing a very clever game . These characters have denied Ab and Simon for a ridiculously long time , so is JLB now attempting to bring them in from the cold ? (Could he also be setting his sights on simons ssss model ?)

                This approach just happens to coincide with a little story in the media of trolls harassing crisis actors . The subject of the story was certainly one of these “high output” characters . These chaps also seem to carry a bit of hate baggage . Blacks , jews , gays etc .

                Yes fakeology can be a lonely and paranoid place !

                 

                 
                • Vespadouglas

                  Vespadouglas 6:11 am on June 21, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                  I suggest that russianvids , peekay and how I see the world are a new kind of gatekeeper . Their research is fantastic at times but they just seem to go around in circles . Just today , I watched a peekay video about a happy birthday balloon . The guy involved was debunked a week ago ffs . Move on dude !.
                  This seems to be their strategy . So much else has happened in the week but these dudes just keep people fucused on already proven BS.
                  I think this is a concerted move against AB and SS and their sites .

                • fakeologist

                  fakeologist 6:46 am on June 21, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                  Can you post a link to that screenshot?

                • John le Bon

                  John le Bon 6:41 pm on June 22, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                  I have been of the opinion for some time that the YouTubers who focus on what I term ‘Baby Hoaxes’ do more to slow down research/discovery than to promote it. Endlessly focusing on the latest shooting hoax, getting into petty disputes about this event or that personality, and rarely if ever focusing on the forest rather than the trees: this is their lot, but is it their intention (or job)? I don’t know.

                  Over the past 12-18 months I have done my fair share to promote fakeologist and cluesforum. These ‘high-output’ characters cannot pretend to be unaware of or unfamiliar with the sites, their contributors and their content. Sadly for those who want to see the Fakeologist/CF perspective gather more momentum, most people involved in these sites are either unwilling or unable to engage directly with the prominent YouTubers by releasing their own videos.

                  ‘The medium is the message’. The medium for the Baby Hoax pushers is (YouTube) video. Want the attention of the Baby Hoaxers and their audiences? Start making videos (and creating live hangouts). It is that simple. It is that simple. It is that simple.

                  When I first started promoting the ‘nuke hoax’ meme within the ‘hoaxbusting community’ (Jeff C etc) circa Feb/March 2015, I was attacked for it both publicly, privately and behind closed doors. Even ‘No Planes’ was still controversial. Fast forward to today and these topics are no longer taboo. I am obviously not the only person involved in this awareness transition but, among the more prominent names involved in Baby Hoax community, I have no qualms in suggesting I have been the most successful in helping push this transition along.

                  It would not take many people making a conscious effort to engage with the Baby Hoaxers and propagating the ‘nuke hoax’ meme (for instance) to help it go from an ambivalent, almost-fringe topic to one of prime interest. How many out there reading this are willing to put in the hours to engage with the Baby Hoaxers, create videos/live hangouts, and propagate worthwhile memes? My experience tells me that other than myself, the answer is ‘few if any’. And that right there is the problem.

                  Peace and good tidings.

                  • Vespadouglas

                    Vespadouglas 7:58 pm on June 22, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                    Im not here to “simply” make videos . Im here to discuss fakery and share research and opinion with like minded individuals . Simple as !

                • Tom-Dalpra

                  Tom-Dalpra 6:50 pm on June 22, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                  mmm…

                  John Le Bon seemed to have a real thing about there being NO so-called ‘paid shills ‘ online at one time. He kept going on about it. He did a show with ‘ Jeff C where he argued the point which gave Jeff ( a known ‘paid shill’ haha ) the chance to look good in arguing – the obvious truth -that there are agents online in the youtube community in alternative fields.
                  I wondered at the time why John seemed to be even entertaining Jeff C, let-alone making him look good.

                  • John le Bon

                    John le Bon 11:17 pm on June 22, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                    I remember well your comments following the ‘Jeffrey vs JLB’ debate, and I lost a lot of respect for you at the time as a result of those comments. We had Jeffrey claiming that a solitary MSM article (about a police officer infiltrating a green movement), Edward Snowden’s ‘leaks’, and his own personal ‘death threats’, were his ‘proof’ that paid shills exist; and me pointing out that this is weak evidence (at best) for the position being put forward. For you or anybody else to suggest that this made Jeffrey (and his position) ‘look good’ is, to me, laughable and ridiculous.

                    I think this goes to the heart of something I said in a Comment Review late last year regarding KHam and a small group of fellow ‘fakeologists’: some of you seem to want to think you are FAR more important than you really are. No offence. You are not a threat to the establishment in any way whatsoever. Some of your research might be, if it were disseminated widely enough to influence the behaviour of others. How far widely is your research disseminated? A few dozen (perhaps a few hundred) other like-minded people, who congregate on website(s) which are on the fringe of an online ‘community’ (for want of a better term) which itself is on the fringe of the wider internet collective.

                    It is clear that I have done what I can to bring this fringe-fringe to the fore of the fringe (and to make the fringe more accessible to the broader masses). Have I succeeded? Not in the absolute sense but, as I intimated earlier, there is no doubt that the conversation within the fringe has changed over the past year and for that I do take my fair share of credit.

                    In the meantime, people like yourself have spent countless hours talking about boogeymen who are holding the truth back, and some have even gone so far as to suggest that I am one of those boogeymen. I hope that in time you will realise how ridiculous your position looks to the tiny few of us who aren’t still caught up in your fear-based and egocentric paradigm.

                    Peace and good tidings.

                    • Tom-Dalpra

                      Tom-Dalpra 10:59 am on June 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                      When I first started looking at alternative theories on the internet, all I read was stuff from agents of disinformation. Far from being non-existent in these fields, time has shown that controlled agents are in fact part of the landscape and because it was confusing and I’ve been led down so many false trails, as I’ve looked at various things, over the years, I’ m thankful, now ,that experience has taught me to be a little wary, at least.

                      If you’re either too wet behind the ears to understand it, or you’re not the intellect I thought you were John, then I apologise for even inferring you may have been acting deliberately strangely.

                      Either way, you’re acting a little strangely to me, and as Vespa says, I just call it as I see it, what/whoever. No big deal. As you suggest, who the fuck’s gonna read it anyway?

                      Agents of obfuscation and misdirection are part of the scenery in these ‘fringe’ areas of alternative research.

                      ==

                      While you’re there, I have a small gripe. I don’t like the term ”Hoaxbusters Community ” you often use . Is it your term ?
                      I’ve heard you talking in terms of Jeff C being part of this ‘hoaxbusters community ”

                      As far as I know there’s a site and radio show with Chris Kendall called ”Hoaxbusters”.
                      This has nothing to do whatsoever, and is not in any community with, for example, anything the clown Jeff C does.

                      Everytime you say hoaxbusters I think of Chris Kendall.

                      It’s a bit like Mark Sargent and his FlatEarth Clues, maybe ? It feels like discredit by association.
                      (Again ) Deliberate or not, I don’t like it, because, as far as I can tell, most of the people in this so-called ”hoaxbusters community” are jokers, whether they mean it or not and Chris Kendall is not a ‘joker’ as far as I’m concerned.

                      Are we bundling Russianvids, Peekay, Jeff C, Jungle Surfer, David Weiss, and Mark Sargent together with Hoaxbusters.org ?
                      If so, I think that’s a travesty.

                      • John le Bon

                        John le Bon 8:45 pm on June 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                        1) You can be as ‘wary’ as you want. I too was taken in by some deceivers when I first got into this scene. Now I am skeptical. Skeptical, as in, looking for evidence before reaching conclusions. If you are being honest, you have reached the conclusion that most (if not all) prominent voices in this scene are nefarious. You do not have sufficient evidence for this conclusion but you hold it anyway. You are wary, I am skeptical.

                        2) Vespa and others can criticise my ‘style’ all they like. What difference does it make? Nobody is here presenting evidence to disprove a single thing I am saying. Is this because they can prove I am wrong, but prefer to focus on ad hominems? Perhaps, but more likely they simply can’t disprove anything I say. People tell themselves they base their beliefs on evidence, and they tell themselves they are focused on research and objective information, they tell themselves they are here to learn and share knowledge. Their behaviour says otherwise, and it sticks out like dogs balls.

                        3) I refer to Jeffrey and his online cult as the ‘hoaxbusting community’ because that was how I knew it because that was my introduction to this scene. I understand that others may feel Chris Kendall & co should have a monopoly on the term. i also understand you may feel as though Jeffrey etc intentionally stole/misappropriated the term, which could well be possible in the sense that anything is possible. You may be pleased to learn that I plan to soon start heavily promoting the ‘goof community’ meme and once that seed has germinated I will refer to Jeffrey etc as the ‘goof community’ rather than the ‘hoaxbusting community’.

                        Finally I have nothing against you or anybody else, Tom. We are among a tiny, tiny few who can see what others can’t, and an even tinier few who are not too scared or demoralised to speak openly about what we see. People like yourself and Vespa are not my enemeies.

                        Increasingly, though, I am realising that my enemy’s enemies are not necessarily my friends. Some people are here for evidence-based discussion, others are here to share their own psychological misgivings about the content they consume. There is some overlap but it is much smaller than some care to recognise.

                        Peace.

                • fakeologist

                  fakeologist 7:03 pm on June 22, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                  JLB, I think you are a stand up, legit dude. I like your work. I am not good at sorting out the paid from the unpaid, but it would be foolish to think that with the unlimited military budget of the global players, they wouldn’t create a whole department to manage their hoaxes. To what extent we are infiltrated, I couldn’t tell you. I know I am not paid to disrupt, and that’s about it. I hope you aren’t!

                  • John le Bon

                    John le Bon 11:20 pm on June 22, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                    Of course they could be doing what you suggest. It seems a logical inference that they would. but this is all it is: an inference. What proof do you have that any of these characters, some of whom have perhaps a few thousands ‘subs’ and average viewcounts around 2-3k, are paid shills? Precisely zero. So why waste time focusing on the messenger when there is so much more to be gained by looking at the validity of their message?

                    If people want to believe they are being monitored or subverted by ‘paid shills’ I generally won’t try to change their mind. Why? because beliefs held without evidence are not opinions which will be changed by me pointing out that lack of evidence. It is emotions-based belief. People with these beliefs hold them for their own reasons.

                    You are a wise man who has been in this scene longer than me. you know all of this.

                    Peace and good tidings.

                    • Vespadouglas

                      Vespadouglas 4:51 am on June 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                      I would suggest the term “paid shill ” is a red herring . Do you believe , jlb , that Ltv (promoted by your old potato friends ) is the real deal ?
                      If not , what do you suggest is his reasoning and goal?

                      As for the fringe fringe nonsense. I , myself, am not here to win over , persuade or convert anybody. Im here to learn and discuss my opinions on the world with 1 , 100 or 1000 people who think similarly.
                      “what it is”

                    • Vespadouglas

                      Vespadouglas 8:43 am on June 24, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                      I wouldn’t go as far as calling fakeologist.com a ” scene” . There may well be a truth scene but im not sure that most fakeologists are, or would choose to be part of it . Fakeologist is a place where opinions matter .
                      People here voice those opinions on the weird , wonderful and normal in speculative imaginative , at times genius and downright ridiculous thought . If asked ,im sure most , if not all would give a straightforward honest opinion on the legitimacy or otherwise ( and reasoning for) of anything or anyone . Is that bad? To have an opinion is wrong ? In this world of deceit ? I’m 95+% confident SS and ab are on the level . tom will push a 97 felix a 98 and rollo rings the bell at 99+ .
                      70% or less youve got your pk , rv , js , hostw ,
                      Everyone else is on an even chance whilst the obvious – steere , vice , Ltv , dubay , sergeant etc can just fuck right off.
                      Jlb – 82 ish .
                      Its just opinion .

                      Im personally not interested in reaching out to fringes or communities . Individuals yes , you tube dudes no . I’m not trying to wake the masses up . I do approach individuals and suggest alternative ideas and directions to cf and here but that’s as far as it goes.

                      As I said , your replies are seldom civil when your opinion is contested ( sort of underlying venom with a veneer front) but you are , as I said , very clever. I enjoy your chat , I dont remember any ad hom about your style and I certainly wouldnt class you as an enemy or a friend .
                      I am questioning an apparent coming together of typical content/behaviour/styled truthers and a seeming reach out to what I would suggest are legitimate truth seekers . Part of that was facillitated by you . Thats suss for me .
                      Nothing personal , no offence intented. If it was rollo reaching out to russian vids and you facillitated that , then the suss would shift from you to rollo .

                      Thats about it dude . Peace out

                • Vespadouglas

                  Vespadouglas 4:59 am on June 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                  Without trying to speak for tom can I just say that ive seen him call out numerous people . You , me , ss and ab to name a few. Does he do this because someone said something about kham or fakeologists?
                  No.
                  He does this because he thinks someone may be wrong.

                  • Vespadouglas

                    Vespadouglas 9:00 am on June 23, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                    I have no gripe with you jlb , quite the opposite . You are one of the few people I subscribe to in any way . You are a very clever and interesting young man . Your opinion on many things is not very different to mine but when it does differ your responses are seldom civil . Egocentric

                    • Vespadouglas 6:04 am on June 30, 2016 Permalink | Reply

                      We now have pk being mentioned and somewhat ” promoted ” in the mainstream Media .Possibly thousands of curious people and potential new truth seekers will go online and check PK out . I’m sure the best thing pk could do , at that moment , is put out a new video stating that Bill Hicks is Alex Jones .

                      “Orlando was a hoax , Bill hicks is alex jones , 100% , no doubt about it , if you cant see that youre completely blind ” says pk …
                      Good work dude.

              • fakeologist

                Fakeologist 3:17 pm on June 20, 2016 Permalink | Reply  

                33.6 C on the sun’s biggest day 

                temperature

                sun solstice

                 

                ← Older posts

                c
                Compose new post
                j
                Next post/Next comment
                k
                Previous post/Previous comment
                r
                Reply
                e
                Edit
                o
                Show/Hide comments
                t
                Go to top
                l
                Go to login
                h
                Show/Hide help
                shift + esc
                Cancel